Acer R271bmid 27 Inch large FHD UK
- With an ultra-thin enclosure of only 6.6 mm, the R1 Series monitors are thinner than many smartphones
- On the exquisitely crisp screen movies and games become even more immersive, while presentations appear in dynamic brightness
- R1 Series monitors let you revel in super-sharp visuals and bring you into a colourful world of full high definition
- Provides splendid quality in wide angles with in-plane switching panel; Accurate across 178 degrees. No grey-level inversion or colour washout
- Zero-frame design provides the maximum viewing experience and support multi-monitor setups
Acer R271 LED monitor 27 1920 x 1080 IPS 250 cdm2 4 ms HDMI DVI VGA sound system black UMHR1EE001 Monitors Monitors
X 1080 IPS 250 Cdm2 4 Ms HDMI DVI VGA sound system Black UMHR1EE001 Monitors Monitors
Acer R271bmid 27 Inch large FHD Related Posts
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI CL3 Cable - 1.8 m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard)
- Zotac GeForce GTX 1050Ti 4 GB Mini Graphics Card - Black
- Acer S271HL 27 inch Widescreen Full HD Monitor (16:9, LED, 1 ms, 100M:1, ACM, 250nits, DVI, HDMI, Audio Out, Acer EcoDisplay) - Black
- Cooler Master MasterKeys Lite L Combo with RGB Mem-chanical Gaming Keyboard and Mouse Combo 'Full Size, RGB LED, Mem-Chanical' SGB-3040-KKMF1-UK
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the a lot of suitable to use one show or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, deliver the results automation... What is the a lot of suitable screen?
As you know, in the economy there is a total offer of screens. There are panoramic, particularly panoramic, extensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to understand which option would be more attractive. So, to avoid opting for the primary one you see or the one that a lot of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the a lot of suitable PC monitor for you?
The primary thing I would enjoy you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterwards have exciting with your a lot of suitable screen, but in least you will understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you come up with of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovations and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that accommodates nicely with the help of a lot of of the multimedia system information that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the help of the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while some of those of 16:10 were somewhat frequent but little by little they were giving option to some of those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that in the time of visiting a lot of videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not in all attractive. possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the particularly panoramic displays are becoming popular. with the help of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil you to have exciting with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from extensive HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly so I will do a speedy review to have them certainly located, especially to see the ones given according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become particularly panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, some of those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might possibly think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a lot of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A situation of size
If the resolution is an important position the show size too. Firstly because it conditions the visiting distance and secondly because a extensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed graphic and not some of those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring certainly is key. If you are going to sit in a distance of less than one meter you have to search for a show size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or endless movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.
And we go with the help of one of the a lot of controversial points. In show themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the a lot of suitable graphic high quality as a rule. together as a result of visiting angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is more valuable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always suitable for what uses. TN panels due to more valuable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is likely to have exciting with a higher performance when playing in a challenging option the newest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the difficulty of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which show would be a lot of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a lot of significant option. You can view more code and open a large range of apps in once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or particularly panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another alternative would be to come up with use of two screens 1080p, being able to area one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or smart practica ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for some of those who come up with use of several packages in the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in particularly excessive definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly if you deliver the results in 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a highly effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as certainly as packages and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the maximal refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we produce aid for innovations enjoy Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with the help of 1080p resolution or as is the case with the help of some 32" with the help of 1440p resolution come up with sure you play in an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more highly effective PC in the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of information in games and we will obtain to play with the help of adjustments in excessive or particularly stage without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For challenging players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the a lot of suitable right now.