AOC G2460PF 24 inch 144 Hz LED Gaming Monitor (1 ms Response Time, Height Adustable, Display Port, HDMI, DVI, VGA, Speakers, Adaptive Sync, Vesa) Black UK
AOC G2460PF 24 inch 144 Hz LED UK
- AMD FreeSync enables a seamless synchronisation of GPU and monitor refresh rates without sacrificing performance
- Pixel response time of 1 ms GTG means speed without the smear. Brightness-350 cd/m²
- AOC i-Care technology for detecting the intensity of the surrounding light and adjusting monitor brightness accordingly
- Built-in speakers make it easy to catch up with family, friends and colleagues
- AOC- four way adjustable stand allows the user to effortlessly modify the monitor height by 130 mm
AOC G2460PF LCD monitor 24 1920 x 1080 TN 350 cdm2 10001 1 ms HDMI DVID VGA DisplayPort presenters black G2460PF Monitors Monitors
Monitor 24 1920
X 1080 TN 350
Cdm2 10001 1 Ms HDMI DVID VGA DisplayPort presenters Black G2460PF Monitors Monitors
►AOC G2460PF 24 inch 144 Hz LED Gaming Monitor (1 ms Response Time, Height Adustable, show Port, HDMI, DVI, VGA, Speakers, Adaptive Sync, Vesa) - Black UK
AOC G2460PF 24 inch 144 Hz LED Related Posts
- Cable Matters Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable 2 Metres
- DP to DP Cable, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable 4K Resolution Ready (Black) - R1104
- DP to DP Cable,TechRise 2-Meters Gold Plated DisplayPort to DisplayPort (DP v1.2) Audio and Video Cable 4K Resolution Supportted-Male to Male
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Desktop CPU - AM4/Hex Core/GHz/16MB/65W
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the vitality needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the almost all suitable to use one computer screen or another. And is that the encounter of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, company automation... What is the almost all suitable screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, super panoramic, comprehensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different integrated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to know which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to keep crysta of opting for the to start with one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the almost all suitable PC monitor for you?
The to start with thing I would including you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can eventually attain your almost all suitable screen, but on least you will know what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovations and many other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that accommodates nicely by using almost all of the multimedia units content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use many other aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat typical but little by little they were giving strategy to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that on the time of enjoying almost all clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not on all attractive. possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the super panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That facilitates you to delight in the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from comprehensive HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly so I will do a short review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones proposed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In many other options that do not become super panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A subject of size
If the resolution is an important place the computer screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the enjoying distance and secondly because a comprehensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed appearance and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit on a distance of less than one meter you have to look and feel for a computer screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, based on on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the almost all controversial points. In computer screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the almost all suitable appearance leve as a rule. al thru enjoying angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness results is much better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always ideal for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of many other technologies, it is probable to attain a higher results when playing in a demanding strategy the hottest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the concern of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which computer screen would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all intriguing option. You can view a lot more code and open several apps on once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or super panoramic panels are very good choices. Another substitute would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or music ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on hand toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who make use of several applications on the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in super significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly if you get the job done on 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a successful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as applications and many other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the utmost refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we involve service for innovations including Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the predicament by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution make sure you execute on an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more successful PC on the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater degree of information in games and we will find to execute by using adjustments on significant or super degree without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For demanding players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the almost all suitable right now.