Acer UM FX0EE 005 24 Inch LCD UK
- Device type: monitor
- Clear screen
- High Quality output
- Adjustable Display
Acer KA240H LED monitor 24 1920 x 1080 TN 250 cdm2 10001 5 ms HDMI DVI VGA black UMFX0EE005 Monitors Monitors
X 1080 TN 250 Cdm2 10001 5 Ms HDMI DVI VGA Black UMFX0EE005 Monitors Monitors
Acer UM FX0EE 005 24 Inch LCD Related Posts
- Acer K242HLbd 24 inch Widescreen FHD LED Monitor (5 ms, 100 M:1, ACM 250 Nits, LED, DVI with HDCP) - Black
- Wavlink Universal USB 3.0 Dual Video Docking Station Plug and Play DisplayLink Share DVI 1080P HDMI, Quick Charging, Gigabit LAN, Mic Ports - Black
- Logitech MK270 Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows - QWERTY, UK Layout, Black
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 0.9m / 3 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the most reliable to use one tv screen or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, get the job done automation... What is the most reliable screen?
As you know, in the sector there is a total offer of screens. There are panoramic, very panoramic, extensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this lacking counting the different built-in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to find out which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to avert opting for the 1st one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the most reliable PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would for example you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently accomplish your suitable screen, but on least you will find out what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that work with nicely utilizing most of the hiburan information that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but utilizing the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat consistent but little by little they were giving process to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that on the time of observing most videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not on all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the very panoramic displays are becoming popular. utilizing a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That enables you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration lacking having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from extensive HD to 4K real
No desire to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a effective review to have them properly located, especially to see the ones offered according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become very panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could possibly think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A matter of size
If the resolution is an important time the tv screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the observing distance and secondly because a extensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed image and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring properly is key. If you are going to sit on a distance of less than one meter you have to seem for a tv screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or steady movements to see the total workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go utilizing one of the most controversial points. In tv screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the most reliable image high quality as a rule. together because of observing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is significantly better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always fantastic for what uses. TN panels due to significantly better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a fantastic option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is doable to accomplish a higher performance when playing in a arduous process the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the situation of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which tv screen would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most helpful option. You can view significantly more code and open multiple apps on once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or very panoramic panels are fantastic choices. Another decision would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to place one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate oneself to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the fantastic choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who get use of several packages on the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in very high definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you get the job done on 1080p being able to watch the video lacking having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you desire a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as properly as packages and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the largest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add significantly more manage for know-how for example Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher utilizing 1080p resolution or as is the case utilizing some 32" utilizing 1440p resolution get sure you play on an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more powerful PC on the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater level of element in games and we will obtain to play utilizing adjustments on high or very level lacking penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the most reliable right now.