Acer UM FX0EE 005 24 Inch LCD UK
- Device type: monitor
- Clear screen
- High Quality output
- Adjustable Display
Acer KA240H LED monitor 24 1920 x 1080 TN 250 cdm2 10001 5 ms HDMI DVI VGA black UMFX0EE005 Monitors Monitors
X 1080 TN 250 Cdm2 10001 5 Ms HDMI DVI VGA Black UMFX0EE005 Monitors Monitors
Acer UM FX0EE 005 24 Inch LCD Related Posts
- Acer K242HLbd 24 inch Widescreen FHD LED Monitor (5 ms, 100 M:1, ACM 250 Nits, LED, DVI with HDCP) - Black
- Logitech MK270 Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Combo for Windows - QWERTY, UK Layout, Black
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 0.9m / 3 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- Logitech MK120 Desktop Keyboard and Mouse for Windows and Linux - QWERTY, UK Layout
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electrica needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one filter or another. And is that the encounter of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office environment automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the market spot there is a filled offer of screens. There are panoramic, seriously panoramic, filled HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without the need of counting the different designed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to be aware of which option would be additional attractive. So, to stay in away from opting for the to begin with one you see or the one that a large number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The to begin with thing I would want you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently obtain your wonderful screen, but at least you will be aware of what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you try to make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, modern advances and different aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing additional than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that suits nicely using a large number of of the multi-media content material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use different aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat numerous but little by little they were giving option to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of taking a look at a large number of videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. perhaps even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the seriously panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That permits you to want the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without the need of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from filled HD to 4K real
No need to have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps even so I will do a brief review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones made available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In different options that do not become seriously panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may think that the additional resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a large number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A issue of size
If the resolution is an important point the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look at distance and secondly because a filled HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the additional pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed snapshot and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to seem for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the general workspace. Also, relying on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the a large number of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best snapshot superior as a rule. both because of taking a look at angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functioning is significantly better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always wonderful for what uses. TN panels due to significantly better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a amazing option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of different technologies, it is feasible to obtain a higher functioning when playing in a tense option the a large number of current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the situation of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be exact cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be a large number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a large number of helpful option. You can view additional code and open many different apps at once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or seriously panoramic panels are amazing choices. Another alternative would be to try to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to spot one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate al to editing video or stereo audio ultra-widescreen displays are the amazing choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having accessible toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who try to make use of several apps at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in seriously high definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps even if you operate at 1080p being able to watch the video without the need of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need to have a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as apps and different tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are additional attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the largest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we construct assist for modern advances want Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the predicament using some 32" using 1440p resolution try to make sure you have fun with at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly additional effective PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of fine detail in games and we will receive to have fun with using adjustments at high or seriously tier without the need of penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.