AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time, LED Gaming Monitor, Display Port, HDMI, VGA, Speakers, 75 Hz, Adaptive Sync, Vesa G2778VQ UK
AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time UK
- Monitor Size: 27 Inch, Screen Format: 16:9
- Brightness: 300 cd/m2, Contrast Ratio: 3000:1
- Maximum Resolution: 1920x1080@60Hz
- AOC G2778VQ - LED monitor - 27" - 1920 x 1080 - 300 cd/m2 - 1000:1 - 1 ms - HDMI, VGA, DisplayPort - speakers - black, red
- Plug and Play
AOC G2778VQ LED monitor 27 1920 x 1080 300 cdm2 10001 1 ms HDMI VGA DisplayPort sound system black red G2778VQ Monitors Monitors
27 1920 X 1080
300 Cdm2 10001 1 Ms HDMI VGA DisplayPort sound system Black Red G2778VQ Monitors Monitors
►AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time, LED Gaming Monitor, display screen Port, HDMI, VGA, Speakers, 75 Hz, Adaptive Sync, Vesa G2778VQ UK
AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time Related Posts
- DP to DP Cable, SOWTECH Premium 6ft/1.8m Gold Plated Male to Male DisplayPort to Displayport Cable Adapter 4K Resolution - Black
- Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4 2400 MHz C16 XMP 2.0 High Performance Desktop Memory Kit - Black
- Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16R Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4 3200 MHz CL16 XMP 2.0 High Performance Desktop Memory Kit - Red
- NZXT 2m LED Cable
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the strength needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the a good number of productive to use one screen or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the a good number of productive screen?
As you know, in the market spot there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, very panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this free of counting the different provided technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to find out which option would be alot more attractive. So, to always keep straightforward of opting for the first one you see or the one that a good number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the a good number of productive PC monitor for you?
The first thing I would enjoy you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on achieve your a good number of suitable screen, but at least you will find out what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing alot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fits nicely with a good number of of the multimedia system subject material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while many of 16:10 were somewhat widespread but little by little they were giving means to many of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that at the time of looking at a good number of online videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not at all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the very panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allows you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration free of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a brief review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones marketed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become very panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, many of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may perhaps think that the alot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a good number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A question of size
If the resolution is an important issue the screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the looking at distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the alot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed image and not many huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit at a distance of less than one meter you have to glance for a screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or regular movements to see the entire workspace. Also, hinging on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the a good number of controversial points. In screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the a good number of productive image good quality as a rule. both thru looking at angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness functionality is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always most suitable for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a amazing option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is attainable to achieve a higher functionality when playing in a stressful means the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the predicament of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specified cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which screen would be a good number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a good number of interesting option. You can view alot more code and open several apps at once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or very panoramic panels are amazing choices. Another alternative would be to help make use of two screens 1080p, being able to spot one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate one self to editing video or music system ultra-widescreen displays are the amazing choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having attainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for many who help make use of several software programs at the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in very excessive definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you operate at 1080p being able to watch the video free of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as software programs and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are alot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the optimum refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we insert aid for know-how enjoy Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the case with some 32" with 1440p resolution help make sure you take up at an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly alot more powerful PC at the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater degree of information in games and we will get accommodate of to take up with adjustments at excessive or very degree free of penalizing the number of frames per second. For stressful players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the a good number of productive right now.