AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time, LED Gaming Monitor, Display Port, HDMI, VGA, Speakers, 75 Hz, Adaptive Sync, Vesa G2778VQ UK
AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time UK
- Monitor Size: 27 Inch, Screen Format: 16:9
- Brightness: 300 cd/m2, Contrast Ratio: 3000:1
- Maximum Resolution: 1920x1080@60Hz
- AOC G2778VQ - LED monitor - 27" - 1920 x 1080 - 300 cd/m2 - 1000:1 - 1 ms - HDMI, VGA, DisplayPort - speakers - black, red
- Plug and Play
AOC G2778VQ LED monitor 27 1920 x 1080 300 cdm2 10001 1 ms HDMI VGA DisplayPort audio system black red G2778VQ Monitors Monitors
27 1920 X 1080
300 Cdm2 10001 1 Ms HDMI VGA DisplayPort audio system Black Red G2778VQ Monitors Monitors
►AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time, LED Gaming Monitor, showcase Port, HDMI, VGA, Speakers, 75 Hz, Adaptive Sync, Vesa G2778VQ UK
AOC 27 inch 1 ms Response Time Related Posts
- DP to DP Cable, SOWTECH Premium 6ft/1.8m Gold Plated Male to Male DisplayPort to Displayport Cable Adapter 4K Resolution - Black
- Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4 2400 MHz C16 XMP 2.0 High Performance Desktop Memory Kit - Black
- Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16R Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4 3200 MHz CL16 XMP 2.0 High Performance Desktop Memory Kit - Red
- NZXT 2m LED Cable
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the finest to use one monitor or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, clinic automation... What is the finest screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a entire offer of screens. There are panoramic, particularly panoramic, whole HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this free of counting the different integrated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to find out which option would be a lot more attractive. So, to continue to be away from opting for the 1st one you see or the one that a lot of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the finest PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can eventually experience your most suitable screen, but from least you will find out what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, innovations and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a lot more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fulfils nicely by using a lot of of the multimedia system subject material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat recurrent but little by little they were giving approach to those people of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of looking from a lot of clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the particularly panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to experience the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration free of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from whole HD to 4K real
No have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly so I will do a easy review to have them nicely located, especially to see the ones supplied according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become particularly panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may possibly think that the a lot more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a lot of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make a difference of size
If the resolution is an important stage the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the looking from distance and secondly because a whole HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a lot more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not those people huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring nicely is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to glimpse for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or regular movements to see the entire workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to acquire into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the a lot of controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the finest impression high-quality as a rule. together by looking from angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness genera is superior than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always most suitable for what uses. TN panels due to superior response times and refresh rates are positioned as a fantastic option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is practical to experience a higher genera when playing in a tense approach the a lot of up-to-date titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be special cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be a lot of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a lot of helpful option. You can view a lot more code and open many apps from once to acquire advantage of multitasking. 1440p or particularly panoramic panels are fantastic choices. Another substitute would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or audio ultra-widescreen displays are the fantastic choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who make use of several purposes from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in particularly excessive definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly if you function from 1080p being able to watch the video free of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you have a successful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as nicely as purposes and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a lot more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the strongest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we incorporate help for innovations like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the situation by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution make sure you execute from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a lot more successful PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater space of depth in games and we will obtain to execute by using adjustments from excessive or particularly space free of penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the finest right now.