Samsung C27F390 27 Inch Curved UK
- 1800 R screen and eye saver mode for increased viewing comfort
- High image quality with Samsung's Advanced Display technology
- Enhanced gaming experience with free sync and game mode
- 3,000:1 contrast ratio gives deeper black, more pristine whites and sharper detail
- Premium quality fast 4 ms VA panel
- Enjoy a truly immersive viewing experience
- Reduce eyestrain with Eye Saver Mode
- Experience a best-in-class contrast ratio
Samsung LC27F390FHUXEN curved 27 LC27F390FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
Samsung LC27F390FHUXEN Curved 27 LC27F390FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
Samsung C27F390 27 Inch Curved Related Posts
- DP to HDMI, Rankie 1.8m Gold Plated DisplayPort to HDMI HDTV Cable (Black) - R1102
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 1.8m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- CiT F3 Black Micro-ATX Case with 12 cm LED Fan - Blue
- Plugable UD-3900 USB 3.0 Universal Docking Station with Dual Video Outputs for Windows 10, 8.1, 7, & XP (HDMI and DVI / VGA, Gigabit Ethernet, Audio, 6 USB Ports, 20W Power Adapter)
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the virtually all productive to use one tv screen or another. And is that the go by of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, business automation... What is the virtually all productive screen?
As you know, in the advertise there is a total offer of screens. There are panoramic, very panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without counting the different made available technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to know which option would be a great dea attractive. So, to stop opting for the 1st one you see or the one that virtually all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the virtually all productive PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would for example you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can afterward acquire your ideally suited screen, but from least you will know what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you get of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and severa aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing a great dea than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that work with nicely with virtually all of the media information that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use severa aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat recurrent but little by little they were giving means to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of browsing virtually all video clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. perhaps even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the very panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That facilitates you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No demand to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps even so I will do a speedy review to have them properly located, especially to see the ones made available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In severa options that do not become very panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may think that the a great dea resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the virtually all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make a difference of size
If the resolution is an important stage the tv screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the a great dea pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring properly is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to seek for a tv screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or ongoing movements to see the whole workspace. Also, dependant on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the virtually all controversial points. In tv screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the virtually all productive impression of quality as a rule. both by browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness effectiveness is higher than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always great for what uses. TN panels due to higher response times and refresh rates are positioned as a awesome option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of severa technologies, it is feasible to acquire a higher effectiveness when playing in a requiring means the virtually all recently released titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the concern of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which tv screen would be virtually all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the virtually all exciting option. You can view a great dea code and open different apps from once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or very panoramic panels are awesome choices. Another substitute would be to get use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or music go by ultra-widescreen displays are the awesome choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who get use of several packages from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in very significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps even if you perform from 1080p being able to watch the video without having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you demand a very powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as properly as packages and severa tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are a great dea attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest feasible refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring support for know-how for example Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the court case with some 32" with 1440p resolution get sure you have up from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly a great dea very powerful PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of characteristic in games and we will receive to have up with adjustments from significant or very stage without penalizing the number of frames per second. For requiring players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the virtually all productive right now.