Samsung C27F390 27 Inch Curved UK
- 1800 R screen and eye saver mode for increased viewing comfort
- High image quality with Samsung's Advanced Display technology
- Enhanced gaming experience with free sync and game mode
- 3,000:1 contrast ratio gives deeper black, more pristine whites and sharper detail
- Premium quality fast 4 ms VA panel
- Enjoy a truly immersive viewing experience
- Reduce eyestrain with Eye Saver Mode
- Experience a best-in-class contrast ratio
Samsung LC27F390FHUXEN curved 27 LC27F390FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
Samsung LC27F390FHUXEN Curved 27 LC27F390FHUXEN Monitors Monitors
Samsung C27F390 27 Inch Curved Related Posts
- Mini DisPlayPort to HDMI, Rankie 0.9m Gold Plated Mini DisplayPort (Thunderbolt Port Compatible) to HDMI HDTV Cable (Black)
- Invision® PC Monitor Arm – Ergonomic Gas-Assisted Full Motion Single Arm Desktop Mount for 17–27" Screens Adjustable Tilt Swivel with Desk Clamp VESA 75x75mm - 100x100mm. Weight 2kg to 6.5kg (MX150)
- BESTEK Adjustable Monitor Arm Gas Spring Stand Screen Desk Mount Bracket for 15" - 27" LCD LED Computer TVs, Max VESA 100x100, 17.6lbs
- Leaptek Super Slim TV Bracket wall Mount for 14 - 27 Inch Plasma LCD LED Monitor Load Capacity up to 15KG Max VESA 100 x 100 mm
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the many successful to use one display screen or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office environment automation... What is the many successful screen?
As you know, in the promote there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, very panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to understand which option would be much more attractive. So, to steer clean of opting for the initial one you see or the one that many says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the many successful PC monitor for you?
The initial thing I would desire you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later attain your best screen, but in least you will understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you generate of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and severa aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing much more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that wil nicely by mean of many of the hiburan material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by mean of the advent of flat screens began to use severa aspect ratios. For a while individuals of 16:10 were somewhat widespread but little by little they were giving method to individuals of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that in the time of experiencing many online videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not in all attractive. perhaps so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the very panoramic displays are becoming popular. by mean of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That permits you to desire the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. perhaps so I will do a effective review to have them perfectly located, especially to see the ones proposed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In severa options that do not become very panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, individuals of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one probably think that the much more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the many appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A subject of size
If the resolution is an important factor the display screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the experiencing distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the much more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed snapshot and not individuals huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring perfectly is key. If you are going to sit in a distance of less than one meter you have to appear for a display screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continual movements to see the existing workspace. Also, hinging on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.
And we go by mean of one of the many controversial points. In display screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the many successful snapshot high quality as a rule. perhaps thru experiencing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness performance is advanced than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always fantastic for what uses. TN panels due to advanced response times and refresh rates are positioned as a great option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of severa technologies, it is attainable to attain a higher performance when playing in a tense method the many up-to-date titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the issue of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be unique cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display screen would be many appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the many interesting option. You can view much more code and open numerous apps in once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or very panoramic panels are great choices. Another substitute would be to generate use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or song ultra-widescreen displays are the great choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily readily available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for individuals who generate use of several apps in the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in very substantial definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. perhaps if you succeed in 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as perfectly as apps and severa tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are much more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the the many refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we develop assistance for technologica desire Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by mean of 1080p resolution or as is the predicament by mean of some 32" by mean of 1440p resolution generate sure you have up in an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly much more effective PC in the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of fine detail in games and we will secure to have up by mean of adjustments in substantial or very stage without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For tense players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the many successful right now.