Acer R241Y 23.8 inch Full HD Monitor (IPS panel, 144Hz, 4ms, ZeroFrame, HDMI, DVI) UK

Acer R241Y 23.8-inch complete HD Monitor (IPS panel, 144Hz, 4ms, ZeroFrame, HDMI, DVI) UK
Brand : Acer
Model : UM.QR1EE.001
Product : Products UK

Acer R241Y 23.8-inch complete HD Monitor (IPS panel, 144Hz, 4ms, ZeroFrame, HDMI, DVI) - products and solutions UK

Acer R241Y 23 8 inch complete HD Monitor UK

  • Ultra-thin enclosure of only 6.6 mm, the R1 Series are thinner than many smartphones
  • Exquisitely crisp screen movies and games become immersive, while presentations appear in dynamic brightness
  • R1 series monitors let you revel in sharp visuals and bring you into a colourful world of full high definition
  • Provides splendid quality in wide angles with in-plane switching panel, accurate across 178 degrees. Response Time - 4 ms GTG. Brightness - 250 cd/m²
  • Zero-frame design provides the maximum viewing experience and support multi-monitor setups
  • Provides splendid quality in wide angles with in-plane switching panel, accurate across 178 degrees

Acer R241Ybmid238 169 4ms 100M1 250nits UMQR1EE001 Monitors Monitors


 Acer R241Ybmid 238 inch Widescreen FHD ZeroFrame IPS LED Monitor Black Products


 Acer R241Ybmid 238 inch Widescreen FHD ZeroFrame IPS LED Monitor Black Products


 Acer R241Ybmid 238 inch Widescreen FHD ZeroFrame IPS LED Monitor Black Products

Acer R241Ybmid238 169 4ms 100M1 250nits UMQR1EE001 Monitors Monitors

 Acer R241Ybmid 238 inch Widescreen FHD ZeroFrame IPS LED Monitor Black Products


 Acer R241Ybmid 238 inch Widescreen FHD ZeroFrame IPS LED Monitor Black Products


 Acer R241Ybmid 238 inch Widescreen FHD ZeroFrame IPS LED Monitor Black Products



►Acer R241Y 23.8-inch complete HD Monitor (IPS panel, 144Hz, 4ms, ZeroFrame, HDMI, DVI) UK



Post Tags
4ms,144hz,zeroframe,hdmi,dvi,panel,ips,r241y,23.8-inch,full,monitor,acer

Acer R241Y 23 8 inch complete HD Monitor Related Posts





Add A Comment

Your name:

Your email:

Your message:




Which PC monitor to choose

When using a computer, in addition to having the electric power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one display or another. And is that the honestly feel of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.

Video games, video editing, business office automation... What is the best screen?

As you know, in the market there is a concluded offer of screens. There are panoramic, super panoramic, complete HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this while not counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.

With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be more attractive. So, to steer very clear of opting for the 1st one you see or the one that nearly all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?

The 1st thing I would similar to you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can in the future achieve your excellent screen, but from least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you generate of your computer.

Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, engineering and additional aspects to consider.

Aspect Ratio

The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that works out with nicely having nearly all of the multimedia material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.

Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use additional aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat common but little by little they were giving manner to those people of 16:9.

They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of taking a look from nearly all video lessons you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.

But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the super panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That lets you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration while not having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.

Resolution, from complete HD to 4K real

No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. even so I will do a swift review to have them very well located, especially to see the ones marketed according to the aspect ratio.

Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:

1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160

In additional options that do not become super panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:

2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440

A priori, one might possibly think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the nearly all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.

A subject of size

If the resolution is an important factor the display size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look from distance and secondly because a complete HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photograph and not those people huge jagged edges.

That is why measuring very well is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to appearance for a display size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or endless movements to see the whole entire workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.

Panel technologies

And we go having one of the nearly all controversial points. In display themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best photograph good quality as a rule. both of those people as a result of taking a look from angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness overal is considerably better than TN type panels.

Even so, they are not always suitable for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a excellent option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of additional technologies, it is achievable to achieve a higher overal when playing in a strenuous manner the nearly all recently released titles.

Screens according to uses

Given the issue of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be certain cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display would be nearly all appropriate according to your uses.

If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the nearly all intriguing option. You can view more code and open many different apps from once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or super panoramic panels are excellent choices. Another substitute would be to generate use of two screens 1080p, being able to put one in vertical mode.

If you dedicate one self to editing video or audio tracks ultra-widescreen displays are the excellent choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having marketed toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who generate use of several packages from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.

UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in super huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. even if you give good results from 1080p being able to watch the video while not having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a successful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as very well as packages and additional tasks that it performs.

If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest achievable refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we involve guidance for engineering similar to Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.

Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the claim having some 32" having 1440p resolution generate sure you engage in from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.

If you have a slightly more successful PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater factor of information in games and we will get to engage in having adjustments from huge or super factor while not penalizing the number of frames per second. For strenuous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.