- LED Monitor - 59.94cm (23.6") with 16:9 Wild Format, Flicker Free, Plug & Play.
- LED Full-HD (1920x1080 Pixels) TFT Panel, Non-Glossy and built-in Speaker.
- Response time: 2mS GTG, Wide View Angle 160°(H)/170°(V)
- D-Sub (VGA) x 1 and HDMI x 1 Ports and Speaker with EU Power cable x 1, D-Sub .
HKC 2476AH LED TN 23.6" Widescreen Monitor (1920x1080, 2mS, VGA, HDMI Ports), audio - Black
- LED Monitor - 59.94cm (23.6") using 16:9 Wild Format, Flicker Free, Plug & Play.
- LED Full-HD (1920x1080 Pixels) TFT Panel, Non-Glossy and built-in Speaker.
- Response time: 2mS GTG, varied View Angle 160°(H)/170°(V)
- D-Sub (VGA) x 1 and HDMI x 1 Ports and audio using EU strength cable x 1, D-Sub .
- LED Monitor - 59.94cm (23.6") using 16:9 Wild Format, Flicker Free, Plug
- LED Full-HD (1920x1080 Pixels) TFT Panel, Non-Glossy And Built-in Speaker.
Time: 2mS GTG, varied View Angle 160°(H)/170°(V)
- D-Sub (VGA) X 1 And HDMI X 1 Ports And audio using EU strength Cable X 1, D-Sub .
HKC Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the strength needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the top to use one filter or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, give good results automation... What is the top screen?
As you know, in the current market there is a whole offer of screens. There are panoramic, extra panoramic, total HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different included technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to recognize which option would be more attractive. So, to steer clear of opting for the to start with one you see or the one that a good number of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the top PC monitor for you?
The to start with thing I would like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can soon after reach your suitable screen, but on least you will recognize what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you generate of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologies and distinct other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that satisfies nicely using a good number of of the multimedia system article content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use distinct other aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat widespread but little by little they were giving process to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that on the time of looking on a good number of online videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not on all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extra panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow for you to have pleasurable with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from total HD to 4K real
No want to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a easy review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In distinct other options that do not become extra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a good number of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A issue of size
If the resolution is an important idea the filter size too. Firstly because it conditions the looking on distance and secondly because a total HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit on a distance of less than one meter you have to look and feel for a filter size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continual movements to see the whole entire workspace. Also, based on on the size, you also have to carry into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the a good number of controversial points. In filter themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the top photo excellent as a rule. both via looking on angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness end results is far better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always most suitable for what uses. TN panels due to far better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of distinct other technologies, it is attainable to reach a higher end results when playing in a arduous process the a good number of popular titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the trouble of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be distinct cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which filter would be a good number of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a good number of interesting option. You can view more code and open distinct apps on once to carry advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extra panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another different would be to generate use of two screens 1080p, being able to location one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or smart experience ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having on the current market toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who generate use of several functions on the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extra excessive definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you give good results on 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you want a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as functions and distinct other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the greatest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring help support for technologies like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the claim using some 32" using 1440p resolution generate sure you engage in on an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more powerful PC on the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of depth in games and we will obtain to engage in using adjustments on excessive or extra tier without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the top right now.