BenQ GW2270HM 22 inch LED Monitor (Eye Care Monitor, 1920x1080, Built In Speakers, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, HDMI x 2, VGA, DVI) Black UK
BenQ GW2270HM 22 inch LED Monitor UK
- 3000:1 high contrast ratio
- HDMI input
- Built-in speakers
- Flicker-free technology
- Low blue light mode
BenQ GW series GW2270HM LED monitor 22 1920 x 1080 AMVA 250 cdm 30001 5 ms HDMI DVI VGA people textured black glossy black 9HLEXLATBE Monitors Monitors
LED Monitor 22 1920
X 1080 AMVA 250 Cdm
30001 5 Ms HDMI DVI VGA people Textured Black Glossy Black 9HLEXLATBE Monitors Monitors
►BenQ GW2270HM 22-inch LED Monitor (Eye-Care Monitor, 1920x1080, Built-In Speakers, Low Blue Light, Flicker-Free, HDMI x 2, VGA, DVI) - Black UK
BenQ GW2270HM 22 inch LED Monitor Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the vitality needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one screen or another. And is that the know-how of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, office environment automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the industry there is a carry out offer of screens. There are panoramic, really panoramic, whole HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this lacking counting the different built in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to have very clear of opting for the initially one you see or the one that nearly all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The initially thing I would including you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently acquire your great screen, but in least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you produce of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and diverse other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fulfils nicely having nearly all of the media article content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but having the advent of flat screens began to use diverse other aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat common but little by little they were giving approach to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that in the time of viewing nearly all movies you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not in all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the really panoramic displays are becoming popular. having a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That would make it doable for you to have wonderful with the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration lacking having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from whole HD to 4K real
No desire to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a quickly review to have them very well located, especially to see the ones marketed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In diverse other options that do not become really panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one probably think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the nearly all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A issue of size
If the resolution is an important factor the screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the viewing distance and secondly because a whole HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed impression and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring very well is key. If you are going to sit in a distance of less than one meter you have to glance for a screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or common movements to see the whole entire workspace. Also, relying on the size, you also have to have into account the resolution.
And we go having one of the nearly all controversial points. In screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best impression superior quality as a rule. each one by means of viewing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness efficiency is significantly more desirable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always suitable for what uses. TN panels due to significantly more desirable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a excellent option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of diverse other technologies, it is doable to acquire a higher efficiency when playing in a demanding approach the nearly all recently released titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the difficulty of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be certain cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which screen would be nearly all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the nearly all useful option. You can view significantly more code and open a wide range of apps in once to have advantage of multitasking. 1440p or really panoramic panels are excellent choices. Another diverse other would be to produce use of two screens 1080p, being able to place one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate yourself to editing video or noise ultra-widescreen displays are the excellent choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having marketed toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who produce use of several packages in the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in really higher definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you work in 1080p being able to watch the video lacking having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you desire a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as very well as packages and diverse other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the best refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we establish assist for know-how including Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher having 1080p resolution or as is the instance having some 32" having 1440p resolution produce sure you play the game in an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more effective PC in the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater tier of characteristic in games and we will acquire to play the game having adjustments in higher or really tier lacking penalizing the number of frames per second. For demanding players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.