BenQ GW2270HM 22 inch LCD/LED Monitor (LED Eye Care Monitor, 1920x1080, Built In Speakers, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, HDMI x 2, VGA, DVI) Black UK
BenQ GW2270HM 22 inch LCD LED Monitor UK
- 3000:1 high contrast ratio
- HDMI input
- Built-in speakers
- Flicker-free technology and low blue light mode
- Adjustable Display
BenQ GW series GW2270HM LED monitor 22 1920 x 1080 AMVA 250 cdm 30001 5 ms HDMI DVI VGA audio speakers textured black glossy black 9HLEXLATBE Monitors Monitors
LED Monitor 22 1920
X 1080 AMVA 250 Cdm
30001 5 Ms HDMI DVI VGA audio speakers Textured Black Glossy Black 9HLEXLATBE Monitors Monitors
►BenQ GW2270HM 22 inch LCD/LED Monitor (LED Eye-Care Monitor, 1920x1080, Built-In Speakers, Low Blue Light, Flicker-Free, HDMI x 2, VGA, DVI) - Black UK
BenQ GW2270HM 22 inch LCD LED Monitor Related Posts
- Microsoft Wireless Desktop 900 Keyboard and Mouse - Black
- BenQ GW2470HM 23.8-Inch Widescreen VA LED Multimedia Monitor - Glossy Black
- WD Red 1TB NAS Desktop Hard Disk Drive - Intellipower SATA 6 Gb/s 64MB Cache 3.5 Inch
- BenQ GL2250HM LED TN Panel 21.5 inch Widescreen Multimedia Monitor (1920 x 1080, DVI, HDMI, Speakers, 12M:1, 2 ms GTG and 1000:1) - Glossy Black
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the energy needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the best to use one monitor or another. And is that the adventure of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the best screen?
As you know, in the market there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, particularly panoramic, entire HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without having counting the different incorporated technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to understand which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to continue away from opting for the earliest one you see or the one that a lot of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the best PC monitor for you?
The earliest thing I would such as you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later acquire your recommended screen, but by least you will understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and alternative aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that joins nicely using a lot of of the multi-media articles and alternative content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but using the advent of flat screens began to use alternative aspect ratios. For a while the of 16:10 were somewhat repeated but little by little they were giving strategy to the of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that by the time of taking a look by a lot of video tutorials you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not by all attractive. even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the particularly panoramic displays are becoming popular. using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That wil it practical for you to such as the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from entire HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. even so I will do a quickly review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones made available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In alternative options that do not become particularly panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, the of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one wil think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the a lot of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A make a difference of size
If the resolution is an important place the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the taking a look by distance and secondly because a entire HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed image and not the huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit by a distance of less than one meter you have to start looking for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuing movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, dependant on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.
And we go using one of the a lot of controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the best image leve as a rule. the two through taking a look by angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness genera is considerably better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always best for what uses. TN panels due to considerably better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a awesome option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of alternative technologies, it is practical to acquire a higher genera when playing in a requiring strategy the recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the concern of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be exact cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be a lot of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the a lot of interesting option. You can view significantly more code and open numerous apps by once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or particularly panoramic panels are awesome choices. Another replacement would be to make use of two screens 1080p, being able to position one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or new favorite songs ultra-widescreen displays are the awesome choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having accessible toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for the who make use of several apps by the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in particularly huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. even if you succeed by 1080p being able to watch the video without having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a robust graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as apps and alternative tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the optimum refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we combine help support for know-how such as Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher using 1080p resolution or as is the court case using some 32" using 1440p resolution make sure you carry out by an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more robust PC by the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater degree of information in games and we will acquire to carry out using adjustments by huge or particularly degree without having penalizing the number of frames per second. For requiring players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the best right now.