ASUS VP228HE 21.5 inch FHD (1920 x 1080) Gaming Monitor, 1ms, HDMI, D Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified Black UK
ASUS VP228HE 21 5 inch FHD 1920 UK
- 21.5" Full HD monitor with 1ms (GTG) quick response time to eliminate ghosting and tracers for more fluid video playback
- ASUS-exclusive GamePlus provides Crosshair and Timer function for better gaming experience
- The TÜV Rheinland-certified ASUS Flicker-Free and Low Blue Light technologies
- Adjustable Display
Asus VP228HE 215Gaming monitor 1ms HDMI 90LM01K0B05170 Monitors Monitors
Asus VP228HE 215Gaming Monitor 1ms HDMI 90LM01K0B05170 Monitors Monitors
►ASUS VP228HE 21.5-inch FHD (1920 x 1080) Gaming Monitor, 1ms, HDMI, D-Sub, Low Blue Light, Flicker Free, TUV Certified - Black UK
ASUS VP228HE 21 5 inch FHD 1920 Related Posts
- AmazonBasics High-Speed HDMI 2.0 Cable - 1.8m / 6 Feet (Latest Standard) Supports Ethernet, 3D, Audio Return
- ADMI VR-1 Gaming PC ( Intel Pentium G4560 3.5Ghz, Nvidia GTX 1050Ti 4GB Graphics Card, HDMI, 8GB 2400MHz DDR4 , 1TB HDD, 24x DVDRW , Vantage Red Gaming Computer Case, Windows 10, Wifi )
- WD 1 TB Desktop Hard Drive - Blue
- EVGA (04G-P4-6253-KR) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti SC (Single Fan) Gaming, 4GB GDDR5, DX12 OSD Support (PXOC) Graphics Card
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the vitality needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the most effective to use one display screen or another. And is that the practica of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, clinic automation... What is the most effective screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a complete offer of screens. There are panoramic, especially panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this not having counting the different built in technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to comprehend which option would be significantly more attractive. So, to retain away from opting for the primary one you see or the one that most says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the most effective PC monitor for you?
The primary thing I would like you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can eventually attain your most suitable screen, but on least you will comprehend what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you create of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and diverse other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing significantly more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that suits nicely with most of the hiburan article content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use diverse other aspect ratios. For a while the of 16:10 were somewhat consistent but little by little they were giving strategy to the of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that on the time of looking on most video tutorials you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not on all attractive. also so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the especially panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That permits you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration not having having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No desire to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. also so I will do a rapid review to have them efficiently located, especially to see the ones presented according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In diverse other options that do not become especially panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, the of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the significantly more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the most appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A topic of size
If the resolution is an important point the display screen size too. Firstly because it conditions the looking on distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the significantly more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not the huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring efficiently is key. If you are going to sit on a distance of less than one meter you have to require a look for a display screen size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the complete workspace. Also, depending on the size, you also have to require into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the most controversial points. In display screen themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the most effective photo top quality as a rule. together thru looking on angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness efficiency is superior than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always perfect for what uses. TN panels due to superior response times and refresh rates are positioned as a fantastic option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of diverse other technologies, it is potential to attain a higher efficiency when playing in a requiring strategy the recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the trouble of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be targeted cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which display screen would be most appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the most useful option. You can view significantly more code and open multiple apps on once to require advantage of multitasking. 1440p or especially panoramic panels are fantastic choices. Another different would be to create use of two screens 1080p, being able to set one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate al to editing video or audio ultra-widescreen displays are the fantastic choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for the who create use of several purposes on the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in especially great definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. also if you work on 1080p being able to watch the video not having having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you desire a effective graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as efficiently as purposes and diverse other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are significantly more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest potential refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we bring service for technologica like Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the situation with some 32" with 1440p resolution create sure you have fun with on an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly significantly more effective PC on the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater degree of characteristic in games and we will acquire to have fun with with adjustments on great or especially degree not having penalizing the number of frames per second. For requiring players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the most effective right now.