Fujifilm Pro2 Digital Camera XF23 UK
- 24.3MP X-Trans CMOS III sensor
- Complete with XF23mmF2 R WR Lens
- Both finished in a rich metallic texture, perfectly suited to the X-Pro2
- X-Pro2 Graphite, XF23mmF2 Graphite Lens, Li-ion battery NP-W126, Battery Charger BC-W126, Shoulder strap, Body cap, Strap clip, Protective cover, Clip attaching tool, Owner's manual, Warranty+D66
- Effective Pixels: 24-megapixels
- 3.0-inch (1,620K-dot) LCD Monitor
- APS-C sized X-Trans CMOS III Sensor
- 1/8000 sec. Mechanical Shutter
- Fujifilm X-Pro2 Camera Graphite XF-23mm f/2.0 Lens Kit 24.3MP 3.0LCD FHD
Fuji X-Pro2 Digital Camera Body by means of XF23mm F2 Lens - Graphite Silver Taking capabilities to new heights, the Fuji X-Pro2 Digital Camera by means of XF23mm F2 Lens in Graphite Silver is an upgrade to the popular Fuji X-Pro1, and features a new 24.3-megapixel X-Trans III sensor, X processer Pro engine, and Fuji's revolutionary hybrid (optical/electrical) viewfinder. Additional highlights of the XPro2 include: ISO expanding to 25,600; twin SD card slots; 100 % HD 1080p video recording; and built-in Wi-Fi. Specifications: Megapixels 24.3 Sensor Format APS-C Sensor type X-Trans III CMOS Sensor size 23.6 x 15.6mm Crop factor 1.5x Max Resolution 6000 x 4000 Aspect ratio 3:2 Autofocus points 77 Autofocus system Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL difference AF/TTL phase detection AF) Lens mount Fujifilm X mount Frames per second 8 ISO min 100 ISO max 12800 Card format SD, SDHC, SDXC, UHS-I, USH-II
Fujifilm Pro2 Digital Camera XF23 Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the ability needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the ideally suited to use one panel or another. And is that the adventure of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, workplace automation... What is the ideally suited screen?
As you know, in the sector there is a total offer of screens. There are panoramic, extra panoramic, 100 % HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without the need of counting the different designed technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to comprehend which option would be far more attractive. So, to be clear of opting for the first of all one you see or the one that the majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the ideally suited PC monitor for you?
The first of all thing I would want you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can subsequently acquire your ideally suited screen, but by least you will comprehend what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you come up with of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, technologica and severa aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing far more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that wil nicely by means of the majority of of the prosperous content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by means of the advent of flat screens began to use severa aspect ratios. For a while these of 16:10 were somewhat recurrent but little by little they were giving process to these of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that by the time of enjoying the majority of clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not by all attractive. sometimes so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the extra panoramic displays are becoming popular. by means of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That lets you to love the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without the need of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from 100 % HD to 4K real
No have to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. sometimes so I will do a easy review to have them good located, especially to see the ones marketed according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In severa options that do not become extra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, these of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one could think that the far more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A really make a difference of size
If the resolution is an important purpose the panel size too. Firstly because it conditions the enjoying distance and secondly because a 100 % HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the far more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed image and not these huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring good is key. If you are going to sit by a distance of less than one meter you have to glance for a panel size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or steady movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, based on the size, you also have to take on into account the resolution.
And we go by means of one of the the majority of controversial points. In panel themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the ideally suited image high quality as a rule. as good by means of enjoying angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness capabilities is far more useful than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to far more useful response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of severa technologies, it is probable to acquire a higher capabilities when playing in a hard process the hottest titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the challenge of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which panel would be the majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the majority of unique option. You can view far more code and open different apps by once to take on advantage of multitasking. 1440p or extra panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another decision would be to come up with use of two screens 1080p, being able to location one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or songs ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having marketed toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for these who come up with use of several programs by the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in extra major definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. sometimes if you give good results by 1080p being able to watch the video without the need of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you have a strong graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as good as programs and severa tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are far more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the highest probable refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we include things want service for technologica want Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by means of 1080p resolution or as is the case by means of some 32" by means of 1440p resolution come up with sure you play the game by an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly far more strong PC by the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater high quality of outline in games and we will acquire to play the game by means of adjustments by major or extra high quality without the need of penalizing the number of frames per second. For hard players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the ideally suited right now.