Monitors) UK" href="index.php?id=B01N9HTETG&title=HKC 2276H 21.5" LED Widescreen D Sub/HDMI Monitor">HKC 2276H 21.5" LED Widescreen D Sub/HDMI Monitor (Monitors > Monitors) UK
HKC 2276H 21 5 LED Widescreen UK
- HKC 2276H 21.5" (1920x1080) LED-Backlit LCD Monitor - HDMI, VGA, Black
- Brightness: 220 cd/m²
- Contrast Ratio: 1,000:1 (Typical)
- Viewing Angle (H / V): 160°/170°
- Response Time: 2ms (GTG)
HKC 2276H 215 LED Widescreen DSubHDMI Monitor 2276H Monitors Monitors
Monitors) - Monitors UK">►HKC 2276H 21.5" LED Widescreen D-Sub/HDMI Monitor - (Monitors > Monitors) UK
HKC 2276H 21 5 LED Widescreen Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the power needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the preferred to use one panel or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the preferred screen?
As you know, in the current market there is a whole offer of screens. There are panoramic, ultra panoramic, extensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without counting the different bundled technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to comprehend which option would be even more attractive. So, to stop opting for the to start with one you see or the one that almost all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the preferred PC monitor for you?
The to start with thing I would for instance you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can later on gain your fantastic screen, but from least you will comprehend what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and severa aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing even more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fit nicely as a result of almost all of the multimedia content material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but as a result of the advent of flat screens began to use severa aspect ratios. For a while those people of 16:10 were somewhat consistent but little by little they were giving strategy to those people of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that from the time of browsing almost all training videos you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not from all attractive. quite possibly so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the ultra panoramic displays are becoming popular. as a result of a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That enables you to enjoy the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from extensive HD to 4K real
No desire to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. quite possibly so I will do a quick review to have them well located, especially to see the ones available according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In severa options that do not become ultra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those people of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may think that the even more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the almost all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A problem of size
If the resolution is an important factor the panel size too. Firstly because it conditions the browsing distance and secondly because a extensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the even more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not those people huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring well is key. If you are going to sit from a distance of less than one meter you have to glimpse for a panel size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or consistent movements to see the whole workspace. Also, based on on the size, you also have to take into account the resolution.
And we go as a result of one of the almost all controversial points. In panel themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the preferred photo excellent as a rule. the two as a result of browsing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness genera is much better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always fantastic for what uses. TN panels due to much better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of severa technologies, it is possible to gain a higher genera when playing in a stressful strategy the recent titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be specific cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which panel would be almost all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the almost all interesting option. You can view even more code and open multiple apps from once to take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or ultra panoramic panels are good choices. Another alternative would be to help make use of two screens 1080p, being able to spot one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate by yourself to editing video or tone recording ultra-widescreen displays are the good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily obtainable toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those people who help make use of several functions from the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in ultra huge definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. quite possibly if you give good results from 1080p being able to watch the video without having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you desire a powerful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as well as functions and severa tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are even more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the strongest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we combine help and support for systems for instance Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher as a result of 1080p resolution or as is the claim as a result of some 32" as a result of 1440p resolution help make sure you play from an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly even more powerful PC from the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater factor of detail in games and we will have to play as a result of adjustments from huge or ultra factor without penalizing the number of frames per second. For stressful players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the preferred right now.