HP 27er – 27 "Full HD Monitor (1920 x 1080 pixels, LED, IPS, 1000: 1), White 27" con altavoces white UK
HP 27er 27 full HD Monitor UK
- With no bezel encircling the display, an ultra-wide viewing experience provides for seamless multi-monitor set-ups.Panel active area 59.8 x 33.6 cm (23.5 x 13.2 in)
- Vibrant detail from practically any position with consistent colour and image clarity maintained across an ultra-wide 178° horizontal and vertical viewing angles.
- Be prepared for brilliant visuals and crisp images with the unforgettable quality of this stunning FHD display.Dimensions (W x D x H) 62.09 x 19.45 x 45.56 cm (with stand),62.09 x 3.56 x 37.16 cm (without stand)
- By reducing overexposure, the advanced noise filter amplifies your images for crisper photos, videos and games.
Our thinnest LCD display monitor however has a sleek design that's effortless on the eyes. And the crisp, vibrant view from almost any angle comes in an ultra-affordable price. Box comprises A/C strength cable 1.9 m, strength adapter 1.0 m, CD (include U.G., warranty, drivers), QSP(Quick startup Poster), Telephone Card, HDMI Cable 1.8m ( In selected sku/region); 1xHP 27es 68.58 cm (27") Monitor
And The Crisp, Vibrant View From Almost Any Angle Comes in An Ultra-affordable
Price. Box comprises A/C strength Cable 1.9 M, strength Adapter 1.0 M, CD (include
U.G., Warranty, Drivers), QSP(Quick startup Poster), Telephone Card, HDMI Cable 1.8m ( In Selected Sku/region); 1xHP 27es 68.58 Cm (27") Monitor
►HP 27er – 27 "Full HD Monitor (1920 x 1080 pixels, LED, IPS, 1000: 1), White 27" con altavoces white UK
HP 27er 27 full HD Monitor Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the strength needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the the majority of effective to use one monitor or another. And is that the actually feel of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, business automation... What is the the majority of effective screen?
As you know, in the markets there is a comprehensive offer of screens. There are panoramic, ultra panoramic, full HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this free of counting the different involved technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to learn which option would be more attractive. So, to steer crysta of opting for the initially one you see or the one that the majority of says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the the majority of effective PC monitor for you?
The initially thing I would including you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can down the road achieve your best screen, but in least you will learn what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you help make of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, systems and other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that fits nicely by using the majority of of the media articles and other content that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but by using the advent of flat screens began to use other aspect ratios. For a while individuals of 16:10 were somewhat regular but little by little they were giving approach to individuals of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that in the time of experiencing the majority of video you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not in all attractive. sometimes so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the ultra panoramic displays are becoming popular. by using a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allow you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration free of having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from full HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. sometimes so I will do a quick review to have them properly located, especially to see the ones given according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In other options that do not become ultra panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, individuals of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one might think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the the majority of appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A subject of size
If the resolution is an important point the monitor size too. Firstly because it conditions the experiencing distance and secondly because a full HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed photo and not individuals huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring properly is key. If you are going to sit in a distance of less than one meter you have to appear for a monitor size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or continuous movements to see the total workspace. Also, dependent on the size, you also have to bring into account the resolution.
And we go by using one of the the majority of controversial points. In monitor themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the the majority of effective photo quality as a rule. possibly as a result of experiencing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness capabilities is better than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to better response times and refresh rates are positioned as a wonderful option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of other technologies, it is doable to achieve a higher capabilities when playing in a requiring approach the the majority of current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the difficulty of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be precise cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which monitor would be the majority of appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the the majority of interesting option. You can view more code and open an array of apps in once to bring advantage of multitasking. 1440p or ultra panoramic panels are wonderful choices. Another replacement would be to help make use of two screens 1080p, being able to space one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate al to editing video or stereo ultra-widescreen displays are the wonderful choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having readily available toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for individuals who help make use of several functions in the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in ultra superior definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. sometimes if you give good results in 1080p being able to watch the video free of having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a robust graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as properly as functions and other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the finest refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we add more support for systems including Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher by using 1080p resolution or as is the court case by using some 32" by using 1440p resolution help make sure you carry out in an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more robust PC in the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater point of have in games and we will obtain to carry out by using adjustments in superior or ultra point free of penalizing the number of frames per second. For requiring players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the the majority of effective right now.