HARRYSTORE car Rear View CCD 170 UK
- Barrier-free transmission signal 100 meters, 420TV lines high resolution image sensor.
- Imaging chip: 1/4 color ccd;HD camera illumination Effects more clearly at night and day.
- Effective pixels: PAL: 628*586 pixels/NTSC:510*496 pixels.
- Waterproof design for outdoor use.
- Visual angle lens: Diagonal angle of 170 degrees Horizontal angle of 90 degrees.
6.8G shockproof IP67 waterproof stage product excellent is more stable.
Video input: 1.0Vp-p 1.0Vp-p 75 ohm.
Power: DC12V±6V <200mA.
taking pictures frequency: 2.370GHz.
performing temperature: -20degree-+60degree
startup for a assortment of cars, Then reversing lighting positive red, black ground wire.
performing voltage: DC5V.
Receiver Sensitivity: -90DB.
Video Bandwidth: 8.0M.
Frequency tuning mode: Built-in PLL.
indication Demodulation: Broadband frequency demodulation.
transport impedance of the RF: 750hm.
IF frequency: 480Mhz.
IF bandwidth: 18MHz.
Video Output: composite sync Signal.
Net Weight: Approx 160g
straightforward and straight forward to use
1X car rear view camera (NO Retail Box. stuffed Safely in percolate Bag)
1X vitality Cable
1X Video cable
1X English user manual
startup For A assortment Of Cars, Then Reversing lighting Positive Red, Black Ground Wire.
performing Voltage: DC5V.
Receiver Sensitivity: -90DB.
Frequency Tuning Mode: Built-in PLL.
indication Demodulation: Broadband Frequency Demodulation.
transport Impedance Of The RF: 750hm.
IF Frequency: 480Mhz.
HARRYSTORE car Rear View CCD 170 Related Posts
Add A Comment
Which PC monitor to choose
When using a computer, in addition to having the vitality needed for the activity that we are going to perform, it is not the top to use one show or another. And is that the experience of use is marked by the type of PC monitor used.
Video games, video editing, home office automation... What is the top screen?
As you know, in the economy there is a finish offer of screens. There are panoramic, particularly panoramic, comprehensive HD resolution, UHD, 4K... And all this without counting the different included technologies, such as the use of panels type TN, IPS, etc.
With so much offer is normal not to fully understand which option would be more attractive. So, to prevent opting for the 1st one you see or the one that virtually all says you would be interested in, let's talk a little about all this of what is the top PC monitor for you?
The 1st thing I would for example you to do is something I did in his day. I do not guarantee that you can after get your appropriate screen, but within least you will fully understand what your goal is for a future change. Start by listing what use you generate of your computer.
Now that you have your uses and are sorted by importance let's talk about formats, resolutions, know-how and many other aspects to consider.
The aspect ratio is nothing more than the panel format. Typical are widescreen or 16:9 aspect ratio displays. A type that suits nicely with virtually all of the multi-media content material that is produced. That is why it has become the standard for televisions and also on computers.
Years ago, a few, monitors were type 4:3 (more squares) but with the advent of flat screens began to use many other aspect ratios. For a while those of 16:10 were somewhat constant but little by little they were giving approach to those of 16:9.
They were not much in demand and the manufacturers did not find it profitable to manufacture such panels. The reason was that within the time of seeing virtually all video clips you could see stripes in the upper and lower area that were not within all attractive. possibly even so, for many tasks the 16:10 screens bring advantages by having a higher vertical resolution.
But nowadays not only exists that panoramic format, lately the particularly panoramic displays are becoming popular. with a 21:9 aspect ratio the main advantage, in addition to watching movies, is that we have a larger horizontal desk. That allows you to benefit from the advantages of a multi-monitor configuration without having that sometimes annoying split that we have when using two screens.
Resolution, from comprehensive HD to 4K real
No need to tell you anything about the different resolutions that exist for the current screens. possibly even so I will do a quick review to have them certainly located, especially to see the ones presented according to the aspect ratio.
Panoramic or 16:9 screens usually offer the following resolutions:1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
3840 x 2160
In many other options that do not become particularly panoramic we can find resolutions of 1920 x 1200 or 4096 x 2160. In ultrapanoramic, those of format 21:9, the usual resolutions are:2560 x 1080
3440 x 1440
A priori, one may possibly think that the more resolution the better. It is partly true but, as you will see later, it is not always the virtually all appropriate option. Now let's move forward.
A matter of size
If the resolution is an important time the show size too. Firstly because it conditions the seeing distance and secondly because a comprehensive HD 24" panel is not the same as a 32" panel. The larger the size, the more pixels you will see. Something that is not pleasant if you want to see a detailed persona and not those huge jagged edges.
That is why measuring certainly is key. If you are going to sit within a distance of less than one meter you have to look for a show size that you find comfortable. Avoiding forcing bad postures or regular movements to see the over-all workspace. Also, depending on the size, you also have to just take into account the resolution.
And we go with one of the virtually all controversial points. In show themes IPS panels are the ones that offer the top persona excellent as a rule. together throughout seeing angles and contrast, color reproduction and brightness operation is more desirable than TN type panels.
Even so, they are not always appropriate for what uses. TN panels due to more desirable response times and refresh rates are positioned as a very good option for players. In these screens and thanks to the combined use of many other technologies, it is possible to get a higher operation when playing in a arduous approach the current titles.
Screens according to uses
Given the dilemma of resolution, aspect ratio and size is time to address different cases. There may be particular cases that do not touch, but I think the vast majority will behold them, so you can see which show would be virtually all appropriate according to your uses.
If you are a programmer, higher resolution screens will be the virtually all unique option. You can view more code and open several apps within once to just take advantage of multitasking. 1440p or particularly panoramic panels are very good choices. Another remedy would be to generate use of two screens 1080p, being able to place one in vertical mode.
If you dedicate on your own to editing video or new new music ultra-widescreen displays are the very good choice. Being able to view such an extensive timeline saves time. In addition to having out there toolboxes, etc. They are also useful for those who generate use of several uses within the same time. You may be writing a text while you have a web browsing information.
UHD or 4K screens also rival ultra-video editing. If you are already producing in particularly significant definition it is very useful to be able to visualize the final result on a UHD screen. possibly even if you operate within 1080p being able to watch the video without having to zoom while editing is also an advantage. The problem is that you need a successful graphics, able to manage such amount of pixels as certainly as uses and many other tasks that it performs.
If your main use are video games then here my recommendation is clear:1080p panels and TN technology. They are more attractive due to their shorter response time and they are usually the ones that offer the maximal refresh rate, reaching up to 144Hz. If we put guidance for know-how for example Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync then white and in bottle.
Of course, if you opt for panels of 27" or higher with 1080p resolution or as is the circumstance with some 32" with 1440p resolution generate sure you execute within an optimal distance if you do not want the pixel size to penalize the experience.
If you have a slightly more successful PC within the graphics level, the 1440p resolution screens are also very attractive. We will have a greater stage of details in games and we will get to execute with adjustments within significant or particularly stage without penalizing the number of frames per second. For arduous players I think the 2560 × 1440 resolution is the top right now.